In recent years, the 2020 presidential election has been a topic of heated debate and controversy. While the mainstream media continues to promote the narrative that the election was the most secure in history, there are those who question the legitimacy of the results. In a recent statement, DeSantis labeled the theories put forth by former President Donald Trump about the election being stolen as “unsubstantiated.”
Gov. Ron DeSantis of Florida said on Friday that theories by Donald Trump about the 2020 election being stolen were “unsubstantiated,” directly contradicting a central argument of Trump and his supporters. https://t.co/XOeaO5N84U
— The New York Times (@nytimes) August 4, 2023
Drop Boxes and Unconstitutional Measures
One of the key issues raised by those skeptical of the 2020 election is the use of drop boxes. Before the election, drop boxes were inserted into the election process in multiple states, including Wisconsin. However, critics argue that these drop boxes were unconstitutional, as they were not legally addressed in the states’ constitutions. Wisconsin’s Republican Speaker Robin Vos was instrumental in implementing these drop boxes, not only in his own state but also in several others.
Another controversial measure during the 2020 election was the allowance of absentee ballots for any reason in multiple states. Critics argue that this was unconstitutional, as it went against the state’s constitution. In Pennsylvania, for example, the courts recently ruled that allowing absentee ballots for almost any reason was in violation of the state’s constitution.
Lack of Transparency and Access to Polling Places
Concerns about the lack of transparency and access to polling places during the 2020 election have also been raised. In some instances, Republican and independent observers were not allowed into polling places across the nation. This lack of oversight has raised questions about the integrity of the process and whether all votes were counted accurately.
Furthermore, Republicans were reportedly denied access to vote counting centers in key major cities following the election. In Detroit, for example, Republican poll watchers were allegedly kicked out of the center where ballots were being counted. Similar incidents were reported in Philadelphia, where Republicans were not allowed in the vote counting center. Even Democrats have spoken out about these issues, highlighting the need for transparency and fairness in the election process.
Suspicious Timing and Ballot Injections
One of the most contentious aspects of the 2020 election is the timing of vote counting and the sudden influx of ballots for Joe Biden. In several states, President Trump was leading on election night, only for the counting to be halted for various reasons. Then, hundreds of thousands of ballots for Biden were reportedly inserted into the election, shifting the results in his favor.
This phenomenon, known as “The Drop and Roll,” has raised eyebrows and fueled suspicions of foul play. After the initial ballot drops on election night, subsequent ballots were consistently reported in a perfect ratio of Biden and Trump votes. This pattern has never been adequately explained and has been largely ignored by the mainstream media.
Missing Chain of Custody Documentation
Another significant concern raised by those who question the integrity of the 2020 election is the absence of legally required chain of custody documentation in multiple states. Without this documentation, the election results should never have been certified. Critics argue that the lack of proper documentation raises serious doubts about the validity of the election and the accuracy of the reported results.
No professional of integrity can dismiss the substantial amount of evidence and allegations surrounding the 2020 election as unfounded. The issues raised, such as unconstitutional measures, lack of transparency, suspicious timing, and missing chain of custody documentation, deserve careful examination and investigation.