ICYMI – Bill Stevenson, the ex-husband of first lady Jill Biden, made shocking claims about what he calls the “Biden crime family.” Stevenson’s allegations shed light on a dark side of the first couple’s past and raise questions about the extent of their influence and actions. Stevenson made accusations that Joe Biden’s administration is mirroring the actions the Bidens took during their divorce proceedings, targeting former President Donald Trump. According to Stevenson, he was threatened by Frankie Biden, Joe Biden’s brother, during his divorce, resulting in him relinquishing his house in the settlement. Two months later, Stevenson found himself indicted on tax charges amounting to $8,200.
The striking similarity between Stevenson’s case and Hunter Biden’s ongoing tax case cannot be ignored. While Hunter faces two misdemeanor counts for roughly $2.2 million in unpaid taxes, Stevenson suggests that he faced two felonies for a mere $8,200. The discrepancies raise questions about the power dynamics within the Biden family and their alleged influence over the Department of Justice.
Reports have emerged suggesting that Jill Biden wields substantial influence in her husband’s administration. She is said to be actively involved in vetting administration officials, participating in meetings, and shielding her husband from long events. It is believed that Jill takes on these responsibilities primarily to protect Joe Biden from potential harm or burnout caused by excessive workload.
Financial Times and Politico have both reported on Jill Biden’s significant impact on decision-making processes within the White House. In jest, Joe Biden himself hinted at his wife’s influence when asked about running for re-election, stating that he needed to consult Jill before making a decision.
Stevenson’s decision to break his silence raises eyebrows and prompts speculation about his motives. Some may question whether he is seeking revenge or attempting to tarnish the Bidens’ reputation. However, it is essential to analyze the claims objectively and consider the evidence presented. Stevenson’s firsthand experiences and the parallels he draws between his case and the ongoing controversies surrounding the Bidens add weight to his allegations.
Stevenson’s allegations shed light on the perceived power of Joe Biden and the Department of Justice. By claiming that he not only believes but knows that Joe ordered the actions against him, Stevenson implies that Biden has the ability to influence legal proceedings. The similarities between Stevenson’s indictment and Hunter Biden’s case raise concerns about potential favoritism or selective prosecution within the justice system.
Jill Biden’s active role in her husband’s administration raises questions about the motivations behind her involvement. Is she genuinely concerned about protecting Joe Biden from excessive workload, or is there a power play at play? While some may view her actions as supportive, others may perceive them as an attempt to exert control and influence over decision-making processes. The truth lies somewhere in between, and only time will reveal the full extent of Jill Biden’s influence.
Stevenson’s revelations challenge the status quo and invite a closer examination of the Bidens’ past and present actions. The allegations made by Jill Biden’s ex-husband cannot be dismissed without careful consideration. It is crucial to separate personal motivations from the facts presented and seek the truth amidst the sea of misinformation and speculation.