There seems to be more evidence suggesting that Thomas Matthew Crooks, the 20-year-old gunman who fired at President Trump in Pennsylvania, wasn’t acting alone. But instead of getting answers, we’re seeing the same old bureaucratic stonewalling from the FBI, as if they’d rather bury the truth than expose what really happened.
Investigators have reportedly uncovered forensic and digital evidence suggesting that Crooks may have had help, raising serious questions about the extent of the coordination behind the attack. Yet, shockingly—or maybe not—the FBI seems more interested in blocking local law enforcement from getting to the bottom of it. Sound familiar?
Suspicious Silence and Strange Behavior
For starters, Crooks’ parents have gone completely silent since the attack. Not a word to the media, no public statements—nothing. Instead, they’ve practically gone underground, sneaking out for groceries at 3 a.m. like fugitives. Now, maybe they’re just overwhelmed, but given the gravity of the situation, their total shutdown raises red flags. What do they know that they aren’t saying?
Meanwhile, Doug Hagmann, a seasoned investigator with a private team, has been digging into Crooks’ movements and found disturbing connections. Using geofencing analysis, he traced Crooks’ electronic devices to multiple locations, including his home, a rifle range, the Trump rally, and even his former high school. Oddly enough, one of the devices is still active, transmitting from Bethel Park High School.
Coordinated Effort or Lone Wolf Fantasy?
Hagmann is convinced that Crooks had help—and he’s not alone. “This took a lot of coordination,” he told The New York Post, suggesting that multiple individuals were involved in handling Crooks. Could there have been inside help at the rally itself? It’s not out of the question.
And then there’s the intimidation factor. Hagmann was escorted out of Butler County TWICE by unidentified men—likely federal agents or private security. If this was just some random, unplanned act, why are authorities going to such lengths to shut down independent investigations?
The Big Question: Who’s Covering This Up?
We’ve seen this pattern before—the FBI dragging its feet, local investigators being blocked, key details being kept from the public. And if history tells us anything, the truth might be far worse than the official narrative.
Hagmann is right: There are still people out there who were involved, and they need to be brought to justice. But will they be? Or will this conveniently fade from the headlines like every other politically inconvenient scandal?