Kamala Harris Announces ‘New Rules’ for Gun Owners

In a move that’s got Second Amendment supporters raising their eyebrows so high they’re practically hairline accessories, Kamala Harris has announced a new rule: all gun dealers must conduct background checks. Now, before we all get too excited and start thinking this is some groundbreaking revelation, let’s take a step back and unpack what’s really going on here.

So, here’s the scoop straight from the horse’s mouth—or, in this case, from the administration that seems to think the Bill of Rights is more of a suggestion than, you know, actual rights. Harris, in what was probably intended as a mic-drop moment, declared that it’s time for all gun dealers to do background checks on buyers. Wait a minute, rewind and pause. Wasn’t this already a thing? You bet your bottom dollar it was.

Now, for those of us living in the real world, where facts matter and the Constitution isn’t just decorative parchment, this announcement might seem a bit…redundant. Federal law already requires licensed firearm dealers to conduct background checks on potential buyers. But hey, why let something like reality spoil a perfectly good headline, right?

But let’s dive a bit deeper into this political theater. The underlying message here seems to be that by simply reiterating laws that are already on the books, we’re somehow making strides in gun control. It’s a classic case of political smoke and mirrors—make it look like you’re doing something monumental when, in fact, you’re just restating the obvious.

And let’s not overlook the timing and the delivery. With all the subtlety of a sledgehammer, this announcement is paraded out as a bold step forward in the fight against gun violence. Important questions, however, remain unanswered. How does rehashing existing laws address the complex issues surrounding illegal firearms and crime? Spoiler alert: it doesn’t.

What people really need are solutions that tackle the root causes of violence without trampling on the rights of law-abiding citizens. What we don’t need is political grandstanding that offers the illusion of progress without any substance.

In the end, this announcement is less about making meaningful changes and more about scoring easy political points. It’s important for Americans to read between the lines and understand that real solutions are rarely as simple as rebranding existing regulations. True progress will require more than just sound bites; it demands thoughtful, effective policies that respect our freedoms while addressing our concerns. And until then, announcements like these are just more noise in an already deafening conversation.

3.5 2 votes
Article Rating
16 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Patrick Cross

taking guns away from peaceful, law-abiding Americans will only make the violence problem worse

1776

That’s what they want.

Ole feeble Joe

Democrats just don’t get it…

Mk Abe

Dim’o’craps have a serious mental disease just as most dementia patients aren’t capable of realizing their dementia!

Rick

democrats never get it Joe.

1776

The 2A is going to have to be used to put down a tyrannical government sooner or later if we are be free.

OR Patriot

It’s looking SOONER than Later!!

Rick

It just goes to show how dumb she really is. Gun dealers already do background checks.

Lee

Not stated is that she wants anyone making a gun sale where they make a profit. Think you bought it for $100 ten years ago and sell it for $125 now that’s a $25 profit even if it would by you less gasoline now due to inflation. Not only that but you would have to pay for the check.

Ron C

A tyrannical regime will steal your rights to keep you safe, until it is time for the great culling! That is why you do what ever your tyrannical government wants you to!
After all it is the democrat parties way.

Fhockey

They are saying that gun sales between private citizens need to use the background check system. The author of the article needs to look deeper into what the AFT has been told.

Sam Aloof

What she’s actually saying is that with the new statements from the ATF that “private sellers are gun dealers” so even those private party sales have to have “background checks”. Another attempt to undermine our freedoms…

Lee

Buy as many guns you can afford now (off the books). Never on credit for the gun or any ammo.

Happy Warrior

Anything to give the criminals another advantage over the law-abiding citizens of the country, huh, round heels?

Angelika Griffin

AND…A judge already ruled that even ‘illegal’ foreigners have 2nd Amendment rights, allowed such a person to keep his gun for self-defense…just wondering HOW this illegal foreigner even got his gun LEGALLY and with background check??? Doubt it very much…

Steven

They keep claiming to close the “gun show loophole”. That is actually impossible, because it NEVER EXISTED. Anyone selling firearms as a business has been required to have an FFL since before background checks were required, or even widely available. An FFL holder has been required to conduct a background check for ALL sales, for as long as background checks have been required. Individuals selling personally owned firearms are not required to run a check, but still prohibited from selling to someone they SHOULD suspect can’t legally own a firearm.
The same rules apply regardless of it the sale occurs in a gun store, at a gun show, or in the seller’s garage.

Sponsored