FBI Moves on CORRUPT Dem Senator – ORDERS Her to Hand Over Documents

Senator Dianne Feinstein from California has come under scrutiny for her alleged involvement in shady dealings and potential insider trading. This article will delve into the various controversies surrounding Feinstein and her husband, Richard Blum. From their involvement in lucrative government contracts to suspicious stock sales, the couple’s actions have raised eyebrows and sparked investigations. Let’s take a closer look at the allegations against Senator Feinstein and her husband.

Feinstein’s Husband and Crony Capitalism

One of the most notable controversies involving Senator Feinstein and her husband revolves around their alleged engagement in crony capitalism. Richard Blum, Feinstein’s husband, has been accused of using his connections and influence to secure lucrative government contracts for his company, CBRE. In 2011, CBRE was selected as the sole real estate agent for sales expected to reach a staggering $19 billion. It is worth noting that Blum served as the chairman of CBRE from 2001 to 2014 and was a member of its board. This raises concerns about potential conflicts of interest and favoritism.

The High-Speed Rail Project Contract

In 2013, another controversy emerged when a construction group partially owned by Blum’s investment firm secured a massive construction contract for California’s high-speed rail project. The contract was valued at nearly $1 billion. This raised questions about whether Senator Feinstein’s position and influence played a role in awarding such a lucrative contract to a company associated with her husband.

Insider Trading Allegations

More recently, Senator Feinstein and her husband have faced allegations of insider trading. It was revealed that they sold between $500,000 to $1 million in stocks from a biotech company, Allogene Therapeutics, just before the coronavirus outbreak. This suspicious timing has raised concerns about whether they had access to insider information regarding the potential impact of the pandemic on the stock market. Feinstein has denied any wrongdoing and claimed that her assets are in a blind trust.

FBI Investigation and Document Requests

In light of these allegations, the FBI paid a visit to Senator Feinstein’s office and requested documents related to her husband’s stock sales and potential insider trading. Feinstein’s spokesperson clarified that the senator provided requested documents to federal law enforcement, asserting her lack of involvement in her husband’s financial transactions. However, the investigation is ongoing, and the FBI is attempting to establish a timeline of events to determine if any improper actions took place.

Parallel with Senator Richard Burr’s Case

The situation bears a striking resemblance to the case of Senator Richard Burr, who temporarily stepped down as chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee due to an investigation into his own stock sales. Burr faced scrutiny for unloading stocks shortly after receiving daily briefings on the coronavirus threat. Both cases highlight the potential abuse of privileged information by lawmakers for personal financial gain.

Denials and Defense

Feinstein and her husband have consistently denied any wrongdoing. They maintain that all actions were conducted within the boundaries of the law and that they have fully cooperated with investigations. Feinstein’s spokesperson emphasized that the senator had no involvement in her husband’s financial decisions. However, the ongoing investigations will ultimately determine whether any illegal or unethical actions were committed.

Public Perception and Accountability

These allegations against Senator Feinstein have undoubtedly raised concerns about the integrity and accountability of lawmakers. The public expects elected officials to act in the best interest of the people rather than using their positions for personal gain. The investigations surrounding Feinstein and other politicians accused of insider trading highlight the need for stricter regulations and oversight to ensure transparency and ethical conduct within the political sphere.

5 2 votes
Article Rating
9 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
William G Munson

If the FBI is investigating then nothing will become of it for they cannot comment on a investigation while it is going ON! Just another way of Stalling and Covering Up Period

Julia

Mike, great work. I applaud your efforts enormously because I presently make more than $36,000 each month from just one straightforward online company! You may begin creating a steady online income with as little as $29,000, and these are only the most basic internet operations jobs.
.
.
Alternate the connection————————————>>> http://usdollars11.blogspot.com

Last edited 1 year ago by Julia
dennodogg

After decades of graft, chinese spying and a host of other crimes, the fbi decides to go after her now? She doesn’t even know what planet she’s on. How about biden, pelosi and all those bandits in the congress right now? What a crock of schiff

mark

The Democrats are mad that she didn’t resign the way they wanted her to. They want someone more radical than her.

ONTIME

If this investigation is real and has a purpose, Di Fi is already Morte Della, mentally, physically and legally, she and her spouse were known for special interest influence, insider trades, intrusion into areas of finance where she had no biz………Why did they not put a stop to her kind 30 years ago?

Dennis

But Pelosi insider trading !? Crickets

Centurion

The investigations surrounding Feinstein and other politicians accused of insider trading highlight the need for stricter regulations…”

Term limits will work better. With term limits politicians will not have enough time to get entrenched into the system like Frankenstein has.

Bill

The FBI is going to investigate a Democrat? The most laughable story,
I have read in 2023.

Daniel

She’s a vegetable so NOW the FBI cares?

Sponsored