Pelosi’s Daughter Reveals More Details After Father’s Attack

The brutal attack on Nancy Pelosi’s husband, Paul Pelosi, is a devastating illustration of the level of violence that exists in the United States. Democrats like to pretend that there isn’t a problem here, but there clearly is.

David DePape apparently told Mr. Pelosi he would “wait until she [Nancy] got back” before bashing him in the head with a hammer. Apparently, she was one of his intended targets as well.

Thankfully, Mr. Pelosi has since fully recovered from the assault, but regrettably, such assaults are all too common in today’s culture.

Don’t confuse that statement with me being a fan or supporter of Paul Pelosi, however, I am against anyone who feels the need to harm someone else, especially an elderly man regardless of who they are.

But other than the name of the assailant, the name of the victim, and the weapon, there’s a lot of mystery surrounding this terrible event. One huge question is why NBC scrubbed an initial report that said Pelosi answered the door for police, as yet, unharmed?

There were other unsubstantiated reports that a third person was in the home. No one has ever confirmed that rumor. But, as well, no one has ever denied that Pelosi answered the door. According to reports, he then walked back towards his assailant.

This is a strange story that just keeps getting stranger. Now, to add a little more palace intrigue to this crazy story, the Pelosi’s daughter is a filmmaker. There is no indication Alexandra Pelosi is planning to documentary this tragic event.

But if she did, it would seem logical that she’d want to see and review “ALL” of the evidence. That’s what a former girlfriend of the alleged attacker wants as well. Oxane “Gypsy” Taub told The Epoch Times back in November that she doesn’t feel things “add up.”

Taub disputes a number of the claims being made. First, she says DePape believes in progressive ideology. The former girlfriend doesn’t think her ex would harbor ill will towards any fellow liberal.

This refutes a mainstream media narrative that DePape was a radical right-wing freak. He’s not. David DePape is an emotionally disturbed, progressive-leaning oddball. His political beliefs have nothing in common with those of conservatives.

According to The Epoch Times,

During an interview with “CBS Sunday Morning,” Alexandra Pelosi, who’s the youngest daughter of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and her husband, provided an update on her father’s condition.

“He is getting better every day. Thank you for asking,” Alexandra Pelosi told CBS. “The scars are healing. I mean, he looks like Frankenstein. The scars are healing, but I think the emotional scars, I don’t know if those ever heal.”

She said she hadn’t slept since the night of the attack and claimed that some officials made light of the attack. While she avoided naming certain figures, she said that “nobody should think it is funny that an 82-year-old man got attacked in the middle of the night.”

Some insist that DePape already knew his victim. How did he waltz into a home that had to have intense security? Did Paul Pelosi truly answer the door? If he did, why did he supposedly walk back over to a person he felt threatened by?

But, like many others who are following this story, Taub is curious about the reason for the secrecy. If authorities want people to feel secure with what truly happened, why not release all the video? Where’s the bodycam footage from police officers the night of the attack?

If the story the Pelosi’s are telling is true, these items would lend credence to that story. But what if everything isn’t as it seems? That would give them good reason to conceal the facts. Does David DePape adhere to progressive or conservative beliefs?

This might prove motive. But if not, why did he pick the Pelosi house? Of course, top San Francisco prosecutor Brooke Jenkins had to put a political spin on the story, despite the real chance that it had nothing to do with the attack.

Jenkins said, “It’s very sad to see that we are once again at the point in history where people believe that it’s OK to express their political sentiments through violence.” This is obviously an attack on conservatives. But DePape isn’t a conservative.

A strange story just keeps getting stranger by the day. We smell a rat. If there isn’t any peculiar detail the Pelosi’s are trying to hide, then America should see all available video footage. That resistance shows a lot. Something is on that bodycam footage the Pelosi’s don’t want revealed.

1 1 vote
Article Rating
5 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Finklestiener

He was not attacked. Mr.Depape was Pelosi’s sex slave. Even our dogs know what happened!

StealthFighter

I HATE DEPAPE!!!!! He just couldn’t wait for Nancy!!!!!

StealthFighter

Can Depape get a second chance when Nancy is at home???? Just asking.

Alan

No concern, it was just two ‘men’ having a lovers quarrel after playing the game “hammer, hammer, who’s got the hammer”. Paul just lost.

Joe Barclay

I have said that there are too many unanswered variables to this story. 1 the view everyone was shown of the alleged entry point through the bedroom window shows the glass shards on the outside of the house on the ledge. If David entered the house by breaking the window, wouldn’t the majority of the glass be within the house. 2, it was reported that Paul was able to excuse himself and call police from the bathroom with a conveniently charging phone that happened to be charging in the bathroom. If I were an assailant I would never let my victim out of my sight. I could care less if he/she soiled themselves. 3, not taking into consideration that Paul told the police over the phone that there was an intruder in his house and hid name is David but he is a friend, it took a cruiser (what, 10-20 minutes) to respond. Did David and Paul have tea while awaiting the police to arrive? 4, who exactly answered the door? Was there a third-party, did David allow Paul to answer the door, and then return to David who apparently both were in possession of hammers? Why did the police not initiate intervention when Paul opened the door, if indeed Paul did open the door? How could an officer of the law allow a so called victim to retreat back into a situation with a reported home invader who is brandishing a weapon without taking some sort of protective measures? Both Paul and David were acting nonchalantly up until the violent attack AFTER the arrival of the police. Not to mention both men were in a state of undress. This sounds more like a love triangle setup gone bad to shine sympathy on Nancy and Paul’s drunkenness and distract from their criminal behaviors.

Sponsored